Australia Moves to Boost Social Media Privacy With Algorithm Opt-Out

Last updated: September 7, 2026 Reading time: 4 minutes
Disclosure
Share
Australia Considers Letting Social Media Users Turn Off Recommendation Algorithms
  • Australia’s government may let users turn off personalized recommendation algorithms.
  • People could switch to a feed that shows posts only from accounts they follow, in time order.
  • The idea has split opinion online, with some users praising it and others calling it pointless.

Australia is looking at new rules for social media platforms. The plan would let users turn off personalized algorithms. Right now, these systems decide which posts and videos people see. Under the new rule, users could pick a different option instead.

They could choose a feed based on time. This feed would only show posts from accounts a person already follows. The proposal follows other recent moves by Australian regulators, including a ban on social media for younger users. Reactions online have been mixed since the news broke, according to a widely shared post from Pirat_Nation on X.

How the Proposed Opt-Out Would Work

The plan targets the recommendation-style feeds that many platforms use today. These feeds study each person’s activity closely. They then suggest posts based on what a user watches or likes. Under the new option, users could switch that system off.

Instead, they would get a plain, time-based feed. This feed would only display posts from accounts a person follows. Posts would appear in the order they were shared, not the order an algorithm prefers.

The change would not remove algorithms from every platform. It would simply give users a choice they do not currently have. According to the post from Pirat_Nation, the proposal centers on giving people more control over their own feeds, rather than banning algorithms outright.

Some platforms already work this way. The account Roots responded to the news by pointing out that its own app skips algorithms entirely. According to Roots, the platform sticks to a strictly time-ordered feed, and that, in its view, is how a feed should always work.

Reactions Split Between Support and Suspicion

The proposal quickly drew strong opinions from social media users. Many people connected it to wider worries about government control online.

A user posting as The Myth of Neutrality argued that Australian officials keep chipping away at personal freedom. The user pointed to earlier talk of restricting VPN access as another example of the same pattern.

Another user, Locke, pushed back on that concern. According to Locke, many governments only step in because people struggle to manage their own screen habits without help.

A user named Azza offered a simpler fix instead of new rules. According to Azza, platforms should just make the following feed the default view, rather than the recommended one.

A user going by MassivvC voiced deeper distrust of the plan’s motives. According to MassivvC, the current government is pushing the change because fewer people trust official messaging anymore. The user also claimed that large sums of money have shaped how media outlets and platforms operate.

A user named ItzSykadelic linked the proposal to Australia’s earlier ban on social media for young users. The user suggested that restricting access first, then offering a chronological option later, does not really fix the original concerns raised.

Some Users Welcome the Added Control

Not every reaction leaned negative. Several users focused on how the feature might actually work in practice.

A user called SPIROOOOO added more detail about the mechanics behind it. According to SPIROOOOO, switching to a chronological feed could also stop the algorithm from learning new habits. The user added that even switching back later, the feed would likely return to where it left off before.

Another user, dhavi, said the change would genuinely help. According to Dhavi, their current feed already feels cluttered with unwanted content, so a chronological option sounds like a welcome fix.

A user named Kaiser Hetman shared a more personal take on the debate. The user said they once struggled with heavy social media use themselves. Despite past doubts about government involvement, the user said they now agree with regulators in Australia and the UK. According to Kaiser Hetman, medical research links short videos and clickbait content to higher rates of anxiety and depression.

Together, these reactions show a divided public. Some see the proposal as a genuine tool for healthier browsing habits. Others see it as a small gesture that avoids bigger, more direct problems.

What Happens Next

Australia has not confirmed a final version of the rule yet. The proposal remains under consideration, and no official timeline has been shared publicly. Supporters hope it becomes a simple, optional feature across major platforms. Critics remain unconvinced that it addresses their larger concerns about online freedom and platform behavior.

While Australia gives users more control over their feeds, Spur’s Monocle helps security teams identify anonymized, proxy, residential, and attacker traffic in real time. Its Cloudflare integration lets organizations allow or block requests based on the underlying infrastructure, not just IP addresses.

For now, the discussion continues to spread across social media, with users continuing to debate whether opt-out algorithms would meaningfully change their daily browsing experience.

Share this article

About the Author

Farwa is an experienced InfoSec writer and cybersecurity journalist skilled in writing articles related to cybersecurity, AI, DevOps, Big Data, Cloud security, VPNs, IAM, and Cloud Computing. Also a contributor on Tripwire.com, Infosecurity Magazine, Security Boulevard, DevOps.com, and CPO Magazine.

More from Farwa Sajjad

Related Posts