Canadian Bill C-22 Sparks Privacy Concerns From Apple, Meta and Civil Liberties Groups

Last updated: May 8, 2026 Reading time: 4 minutes
Disclosure
Share
Canadian Bill C-22 Sparks Privacy Concerns From Apple, Meta and Civil Liberties Groups
  • Apple and Meta oppose Canadian Bill C-22, they warn that the legislation could force them to break encryption and insert backdoors into their products.
  • Law enforcement supports the bill as a tool to investigate security threats faster, but civil liberties groups warn it could eternally damage privacy rights and cybersecurity for all Canadians.
  • The Canadian bill follows a UK order that prompted Apple to remove encrypted cloud storage features from British users, but officials later dropped that demand after US intelligence raised concerns.

Bill C-22 is currently up for debate in the House of Commons and has created an ongoing battle between large technology firms and government representatives. The tech giants, Apple and Meta, have raised objections against this law, stating that it will require them to compromise their encryption of users’ data.

The bill comes from Canada’s ruling Liberal Party, which was able to pass its legislation by gaining its own parliamentary majority last month. While Canada pushes forward with encryption-breaking legislation, some US states are moving in the opposite direction. California recently chose to abstain from a federal anti-privacy bill, preserving stronger privacy protections for its residents amid growing concerns about government overreach.

Government officials have taken a supportive approach to this bill by arguing that this law would assist law enforcement agencies in identifying potential security threats sooner and responding to those threats faster. The tech companies see things very differently. They warn that the bill, depending on how officials implement its provisions, could resemble a UK data access order that Apple faced last year.

Apple Refuses to Create Security Holes in Its Products

Apple has issued a firm response regarding its perspective. The company stated that with malicious actors continuing to pursue access to consumer information, the passage of Bill C-22 will reduce their ability to provide their users with the privacy and security features they expect from the company.

The legislation could let the Canadian government force companies to break their encryption by creating backdoors into some of their products. According to Apple’s statement, they will never perform this act.

End-to-end encryption allows only the person with a key to access specific information – neither Apple, Meta, nor law enforcement agencies have access to these records without a user’s private key. Services such as Apple’s iMessage and Meta’s WhatsApp use this technology to encrypt billions of messages every day.

Security experts agree that creating backdoors for police would create openings for criminals, too. Any weakness deliberately built into encryption would inevitably be exploited by hackers, foreign spies, and organized crime groups.

Meta Calls the Bill Dangerous and Overbroad

Meta prepared testimony for the parliamentary hearings on the bill. Rachel Curran, the company’s head of public policy for Canada, and Robyn Greene, its privacy and public policy director, wrote that the bill’s minimal oversight, sweeping powers, and lack of adequate safeguards could actually make Canadians less safe.

The legislation could require companies like Meta to build capabilities that weaken, break, or circumvent encryption. Also, it could force providers to install government spyware directly onto their systems.

Some civil liberties groups are working with the tech companies to oppose the legislation. According to a statement from the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, this bill has fundamental flaws that represent a strong risk to privacy rights in the country.

Open Media, which promotes digital rights, claims that there is no back door available to law enforcement that cannot also be exploited by other criminal actors. Any security feature created for police use will eventually face criminal abuse.

The Bill Follows a Troubling Global Pattern

Bill C-22 continues a broader push by governments worldwide to gain lawful access to encrypted data. The United Kingdom attempted a similar move last year when officials demanded that Apple provide blanket access to all encrypted user content stored in the cloud.

Apple refused that demand and instead removed its Advanced Data Protection feature from British users. US officials later stated that Britain dropped the request after Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard highlighted the concerns about potential violations of a cloud data agreement.

The Internet Society warned that similar encryption-breaking powers in Canada could harm the economy and national security. Natalie Campbell, Senior Director at the Internet Society, stated that the Salt Typhoon digital espionage campaign exploited an authorized backdoor within US telecommunications. She warned that Canada could face similar attacks if the bill passes.

Public Safety Canada attempted to reassure critics, stating that the law would not require technology firms to introduce systemic vulnerabilities into their encryption protections. However, Apple and Meta remain unconvinced, pointing to the UK incident as proof of where such laws can lead.

Share this article

About the Author

Farwa is an experienced InfoSec writer and cybersecurity journalist skilled in writing articles related to cybersecurity, AI, DevOps, Big Data, Cloud security, VPNs, IAM, and Cloud Computing. Also a contributor on Tripwire.com, Infosecurity Magazine, Security Boulevard, DevOps.com, and CPO Magazine.

More from Farwa Sajjad

Related Posts