Home » Cyber Security » Guides » Top 7 IoT Vulnerabilities That You Know About In 2023

Top 7 IoT Vulnerabilities That You Know About In 2023

Disclosure: All of our articles are unbased, well researched, and based on a true picture of the story. However we do sometimes get commissions from affiliate sites. Our readers get the best discount from buying from our links. Here is our complete affiliate disclosure.

The security and safety of IoT devices mainly intended for client use remain at significant risk. It is because the number of users is increasing day by day. Each of them has different IoT devices in their houses. They might connect to various networks to carry out their work at their homes. It means that considerable and significant threats emerge both to and through the IoT.

Some threats attack the sole unique nature of IoT devices. While other threats are aimed at the application network surrounding them, some might result from configuration errors that arise from user inexperience or system restriction. Regardless of the case, the threat leads to privacy compromise, loss of control, and adding devices into a network regulated by someone else.

IoT affects almost every aspect of our life. If the IoT devices become exposed to attacks, the attacker can control our entire lives. It then becomes a complicated situation to manage. But the main question is, what makes the IoT vulnerable?

Seven IoT Vulnerabilities:

In this article, we provide your seven IoT vulnerabilities which will give you more precise insight into the topic. The IoT vulnerabilities are as follows:

Poor Web Interface:

Every user is looking for an exemplary user interface, and IoT applications have controlling features and functions. The setting up of devices and integrating them into faster systems and more manageable tasks than they might be. Most IoT devices have a built-in web server that hosts a web app. The web app manages the entire device.

However, like any web app, there might be faults and errors in the code. These errors in the systems allow the device to get attacked. The weaknesses are remotely exploited because all are connected devices.

Secondly, another problem with IoT web interfaces is the same as with plagued enterprise web apps. Although the SQL injections are slightly less of an issue in IoT applications, the command injections, cross-site scripting, and cross-site request fake are all programming faults. These flaws can give criminals and attackers access to devices and a complete system for regulating, monitoring, and accessing real-world operations.

Ineffectual Authentications:

The authenticating of a user for an IoT application is a good thing. When an app can control the building access and environmental access, it should also spy on the inhabitants of a building. It looks like authentication is mandatory; however, in some cases, authentications are missing from the actions.

For IoT applications, two types of authentication are most important. The first one is user authentication. The problematic nature of the IoT environments raises the question that either each device needs authentication or a single system authentication is enough for every device on the network. Most system designers choose the latter due to the persuasion of ease-of-use considerations. It makes strong authentications.

Another type of authentication is device authentication. The single sign usually makes this type of authentication. As the users are not verifying each device interface, the devices in the IoT network must require authentication among themselves. It is because then the attacker may not use the implied trust as a malevolent pathway to the system.

Locked-in Defaults:

The default user credential is the massive, alternating warning signals on IoT security settings. However, they are not the only settings that matter. The network parameters, which comprise ports used, setting users with admin privileges, logging (may or may not be), and event notifications (may or may not be), are amidst the security-focused settings that must be modified to meet the individual's placement needs.

Further, allowing for the security settings that web more thoroughly with an existing environment security infrastructure, alternations to default settings often make the IoT attack surface a fine and less welcoming place for invaders.

Failure of Firmware:

Firmware is like bacteria and peas, which grow from time to time. The problem with IoT devices is that there is no system or technique to load them, making them a severe vulnerability.

The disadvantages of continuously growing firmware are that the updates make the system a moving target. If the firmware on a device is static and immovable, it is easy for the attackers to dissect it. Moreover, they can also develop exploits in their leisure time and launch attacks that will work on every device.

Let's take the example of the VPNFilter attack that happened back in May of the previous year. It is an example of what can happen when an entire group of devices can't update, or if it is up to date, the users cannot apply the updates.

Poor Network Security:

A poorly written IoT app device can make holes in your firewall from the inside out. These are the holes that an attacker uses to get into your systems and launch attacks on IoT devices. This is the same trick that a simple user uses to install IoT devices on their home networks without changing their firewalls. It creates connections by firewalls that attackers can use to avoid the carefully considered protections.

However, in many cases, the firewalls are often facing outward. It means that they focus on traffic from outside, which is trying to get into the network. The IoT devices get around this by initially calling their control server inside the system. Later they continue to maintain the connection with average transmissions.

The criminal can develop vulnerabilities in uncoded and unauthorized traffic by establishing the connection. They then send the malicious traffic back to the network on the open connection.

MQTT Problem:

It is common that when a developer forgets about security, issues arise. With the case of MQTT (a communication protocol from the world of industrial controls), hundreds of thousands of organized systems lack basic fundamental security.

It is essential to note that MQTT and other protocols' weaknesses do not lie among the protocols themselves. The systems depend upon the internet. All attackers are searching to gain access over the IoT devices so; they can get data and launch the malicious traffic in it. However, in this manner, these protocols are enforced.

Unsafe Mobile Interface:

Now everyone wants to use their mobile phone for every small purpose. Many IoT devices have a mobile interface. Since IoT devices are many home products, this makes sense why computers are becoming less necessary.

But, another management interface is another violation that is waiting to happen. Build secure and safe software is not an easy task.

Undoubtedly, IoT devices have a tendency and capacity to make human life much more comfortable. But, it is essential to address and consider the security issues first. If these issues are not discussed and solved, it might lead to severe trouble.

Photo of author
Rebecca James is an IT consultant with forward thinking approach toward developing IT infrastructures of SMEs. She writes to engage with individuals and raise awareness of digital security, privacy, and better IT infrastructure.

Leave a Comment